Shared services and GBS organisations run the same process in every business unit, region or client they serve, and meeting an SLA is a starting point for understanding outcomes. IGX360 Insights gives shared services leaders a standardised, evidenced view of process performance across the whole estate, so improvement and automation decisions rest on evidence.
In your words: “We do not know how work really happens”
A governed, connected view of how work runs gives every team the same starting point. It replaces individual descriptions with one baseline that can be queried, owned and kept current.
In your words: “We cannot quickly see who owns a process, what it depends on or what a change will affect”
When processes, roles, systems, risks and controls sit in one connected model, basic questions take minutes instead of analyst-days. Ownership, dependencies and impact can be seen together.
In your words: “Work is managed through email, spreadsheets and chasing”
A digital workflow that follows the approved process makes status, responsibility and deadlines visible to everyone involved. Hand-offs stop depending on memory.
In your words: “Our documented process is not how the work actually gets done”
When the process model and daily execution are connected, the model stays useful and governance reflects real work. Approved workarounds become part of the design.
In your words: “We have dozens of improvement opportunities but no evidence for what to fix first”
Comparable evidence turns a long list of ideas into a ranked plan. Teams can set a baseline, agree what matters and show the value of each change.
In your words: “Our AI pilots work, but they are not changing how the business operates”
Pilots deliver more when the work around them is redesigned. Defining purpose, authority, constraints, evidence, escalation and how to step back gives human, agentic and hybrid actors a clear operating model.
In your words: “We want to introduce AI agents but do not know which processes are safe to hand over”
A staged transition turns a leap into controlled capability change, one capability at a time.
In your words: “Our systems tell us what happened, but not why the process failed or what to change”
When execution evidence is retained and connected, the organisation can see not just what happened but why, and what to change.
In your words: “Our governance says what should happen, but does not reliably control what people actually do”
Governance that changes tasks, decision thresholds, approvals, escalation and evidence capture is governance you can rely on in operation.
In your words: “Our shared-service processes are not standardised across business units, regions or clients”
A dependable standard process, with variation understood and justified, lets you govern and improve the service across every unit.
In your words: “End-to-end ownership is unclear between the retained organisation, shared service and BPO provider”
Ownership of the end-to-end outcome, with decision rights, controls, hand-offs and escalation defined across boundaries, keeps every party pulling the same way.
In your words: “Process knowledge, controls and accountability are lost during transition or migration”
A governed transition model preserves process context, exceptions, controls, dependencies and decision knowledge along with tasks and volumes.
In your words: “We meet the SLA but still cannot explain poor outcomes or customer experience”
Connecting service measures to the end-to-end process explains delay, rework and the customer's real outcome, not just whether a threshold was met.
In your words: “Continuous improvement and automation cannot be scaled consistently across services or clients”
A common process and insight foundation makes improvement comparable and reusable, with necessary variation kept.
In your words: “AI is entering service delivery faster than governance, commercial measures and accountability can adapt”
Defining authority, human oversight, evidence, pricing, service measures and responsibility for agent decisions coherently lets AI scale with confidence.
In your words: “Shared-service and BPO resilience, supplier concentration and failure dependencies are not visible”
Representing and testing the end-to-end concentration and dependencies behind each service as one operating model shows where resilience is strong.
No results found.
Search is temporarily unavailable. Please try again shortly.
Start typing to search the whole site.
Required for the site to function. Always on.
Google Analytics, via Google Tag Manager. Helps us see which pages are useful.