DORA asks financial entities to manage ICT risk, including ICT third-party risk, through an integrated framework of controls, testing, registers and evidence. The opportunity is to connect those requirements to the functions, processes, systems and suppliers that regulated services depend on, so the register is a living view and not a standalone artefact.
In your words: “We cannot quickly see who owns a process, what it depends on or what a change will affect”
When processes, roles, systems, risks and controls sit in one connected model, basic questions take minutes instead of analyst-days. Ownership, dependencies and impact can be seen together.
In your words: “We think we are compliant but cannot prove it”
Traceability from obligation through process, owner, system, control and retained evidence lets you show how a duty is met, whenever you are asked.
In your words: “We do not know where operational failure will spread”
An end-to-end view of critical outcomes, dependencies, concentration, substitution, controls and recovery assumptions shows where resilience is strong and where to strengthen it.
In your words: “Risks, controls, processes and obligations are disconnected”
A connected process-centric risk model shows which processes create each risk, which controls operate within them and where coverage can be strengthened.
In your words: “When regulations change, we cannot quickly identify every process, control, system and role affected”
Connected impact analysis identifies affected processes, systems, controls, roles and suppliers consistently, so implementation starts from a complete list.
In your words: “DORA evidence is fragmented across ICT, risk and operations”
Representing critical functions, ICT assets, third parties, risks, controls, incidents and testing evidence end to end gives one chain that supervisors and boards can follow.
In your words: “Our governance says what should happen, but does not reliably control what people actually do”
Governance that changes tasks, decision thresholds, approvals, escalation and evidence capture is governance you can rely on in operation.
In your words: “Critical-infrastructure cyber duties are separated from business services”
Connecting cyber risks, systems, suppliers, incidents and controls to the processes that deliver each essential service shows how duties support continuity.
In your words: “Shared-service and BPO resilience, supplier concentration and failure dependencies are not visible”
Representing and testing the end-to-end concentration and dependencies behind each service as one operating model shows where resilience is strong.
IGX360 Insights supports mapping, evidence and assurance. Regulatory interpretation and accountability remain with the organisation.
No results found.
Search is temporarily unavailable. Please try again shortly.
Start typing to search the whole site.
Required for the site to function. Always on.
Google Analytics, via Google Tag Manager. Helps us see which pages are useful.