IGX Solutions

See supplier concentration and failure dependencies in shared services and BPO

In your words: “Shared-service and BPO resilience, supplier concentration and failure dependencies are not visible”

  • Supplier concentration risk
  • Shared-service resilience
  • Failure dependency mapping
01 · Where you start

Critical enterprise services depend on shared centres, BPO providers, subcontractors, technology platforms, specialist teams and a limited number of delivery locations. This becomes most visible when a disruption crosses shared technology, suppliers, locations, workforce or service boundaries faster than impact can be understood.

02 · What makes the difference

Representing and testing the end-to-end concentration and dependencies behind each service as one operating model shows where resilience is strong.

03 · What changes when you get it right

Local outages, supplier changes or workforce disruptions are understood across services and clients quickly, with plans ready.

04 · How to get there

Connected service mapping reveals concentration, substitution, recovery and control gaps before disruption tests them in production. In practical terms, scenario testing and investment decisions can focus on the dependencies most capable of exceeding impact tolerances or service commitments.

05 · What you gain
  • Earlier visibility of concentration risk, faster impact assessment and more credible continuity and exit planning
  • Earlier visibility of concentration and single-point failures
  • Faster disruption impact analysis
  • Better targeted continuity and resilience investment
  • More credible testing, recovery and exit evidence
06 · Questions to ask yourself
  • Which critical services depend on the same provider, platform, location or specialist team?
  • Can subcontractor dependencies be traced beyond the primary provider?
  • How quickly can the organisation identify every service affected by a provider outage?
  • Which dependency is shared by the greatest number of critical services?
  • Which recovery assumption has not been tested end to end?
07 · What the research says

ISG describes governance across AI, platforms and complex supplier ecosystems as a board-level imperative as operational complexity and compliance demands rise.

ISG: Governance That Scales with AI

ISO 22301 provides a framework for identifying disruption risks, planning response and recovery, and maintaining the capability to continue priority activities.

ISO: ISO 22301 Business continuity management systems

Talk to IGX to see the provider, platform, location and workforce dependencies behind one critical shared service.

Talk to IGX