IGX Solutions

DORA evidence is fragmented across ICT, risk and operations

01 · Situation

DORA responsibilities are distributed across ICT risk, operational resilience, vendor management, incident response, audit and business operations. This becomes most visible when an audit, regulatory change, incident or assurance request requires the organisation to prove how an obligation operates in practice.

02 · Problem

Critical functions, ICT assets, third parties, risks, controls, incidents and testing evidence are not represented end to end. The underlying weakness is the absence of traceability from obligation through process, owner, system, control, execution and retained evidence.

03 · Implication

Registers and reports may exist, but dependency gaps and inconsistent evidence weaken resilience and supervisory confidence. At enterprise scale, assurance remains periodic and manual while operational change creates new gaps faster than review cycles can find them.

04 · Need-payoff

A connected operating model supports critical-function mapping, third-party traceability, gap analysis and defensible evidence. In practical terms, change and assurance can be managed as connected operational work, with accountable remediation and evidence available by design.

05 · Indicated value / benefits
  • More defensible DORA mapping and evidence; clearer third-party dependency and resilience gaps; reduced manual assembly
  • Faster regulatory impact assessment
  • Earlier detection of control and evidence gaps
  • Reduced audit and inspection preparation
  • Defensible traceability from duty to execution
06 · Discovery questions
  • Can every critical or important function be traced to its ICT and third-party dependencies?
  • Where is DORA evidence assembled today?
  • Which resilience gaps remain invisible between organisational silos?
  • Which obligation is hardest to trace to a named operational owner and control?
  • What evidence would prove implementation rather than policy publication?
07 · External validation

The EBA states that in-scope financial entities must maintain comprehensive registers of ICT third-party contractual arrangements.

European Banking Authority: DORA Registers of Information

DORA requires financial entities to maintain a sound, comprehensive and documented ICT risk-management framework and addresses incident management, testing and ICT third-party risk.

EUR-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2022/2554

Book a call to assess the completeness of one DORA critical-function and third-party dependency map.

Book a call