IGX Solutions Insights
Positioning Vendor-neutral · Layers underneath, not against iGrafx · Camunda · Appian · Pega · Celonis · SAP Signavio · ARIS

How IGX360 Insights Fits Alongside Camunda, Celonis & SAP Signavio

Camunda, Celonis, and SAP Signavio each own a real, well-earned category, and so do iGrafx, Appian, Pega, and ARIS in the same markets. None of them ship the authoritative, decision-level definition of how work should be done that an AI agent needs before it can act. IGX360 Insights adds that layer on top, whichever of them your process content already lives in, and regardless of file format: iGrafx first, plus Visio, SOPs, and BPMN/XML.

Three layers, often confused

Mining, orchestration, and articulation answer different questions.

Process mining tells you what happened. Process orchestration runs the flow. Process modelling documents how it is meant to run. Articulation, the layer IGX360 Insights occupies, tells an AI agent what to do. Conflating these is where AI projects go wrong, and it is exactly what the sections below are designed to avoid.

None of the tools below compete with IGX360 Insights directly. iGrafx, SAP Signavio, and ARIS model and govern process diagrams. Camunda, Appian, and Pega execute flows. Celonis reconstructs what already happened. Each is strong at what it does. None of them is designed to produce the decision-level definition an AI agent needs before it can act safely, and each assumes that definition already exists somewhere else. It usually does not.

IGX360 Insights is vendor-neutral by design. Whatever data sources already describe your Enterprise Operating Model, BPM repositories, SOPs, Visio diagrams, PowerPoint decks, or XML exports, it turns that content into one canonical model, so the definition layer sits on a foundation, not on a blank page. None of these tools are a prerequisite either: SOPs, spreadsheets, and notes from a process workshop are enough to start. See how the IGX360 Platform provisions and manages that model.

Positioning, per tool · Workflow automation & orchestration

What each tool does well, and what IGX360 Insights adds underneath it.

Process orchestration

Camunda

Strong at

Running and coordinating flows at runtime. Camunda 8 has moved into agentic process orchestration territory.

IGX360 Insights adds

The decision-level definition Camunda assumes is already there: one canonical model of the process, built from whatever content you already hold, for Camunda's flows to run against instead of guessing at intent.

Low-code process automation

Appian

Strong at

Low-code app building and case management that ties workflow steps to the systems and data behind them.

IGX360 Insights adds

The decision-level definition Appian assumes is already there: one canonical model of the process, built from whatever content you already hold, for Appian's case logic to run against instead of what was configured at build time.

Case management & decisioning

Pega

Strong at

Case management and real-time decisioning, combining workflow automation with next-best-action logic.

IGX360 Insights adds

The decision-level definition of the process itself, open and portable, so Pega's decisioning runs against an accurate, current model of the work rather than a point-in-time configuration.

Positioning, per tool · Process mining & modelling

The other side of the category: reconstructing the past, and documenting the intended design.

Process modelling & repository

iGrafx

Strong at

Process360 Live documents and governs process content in a structured repository, the source most IGX360 Insights clients already hold.

IGX360 Insights adds

The same process content expressed as a machine-readable, decision-level canonical model an agent can query directly.

Process mining & intelligence

Celonis

Strong at

Reconstructing what actually happened by extracting event logs from your systems, now branching into AI-agent orchestration too.

IGX360 Insights adds

The decision-level definition of what should happen next, not just a record of what already did.

Process modelling & BPM governance

SAP Signavio

Strong at

BPMN 2.0 documentation, visual modelling, and governance frameworks. A named 2026 Gartner Leader for Process Intelligence Platforms.

IGX360 Insights adds

The same process knowledge expressed as a machine-readable canonical model: 20 object types and 16 relationship types.

Process modelling & enterprise architecture

ARIS

Strong at

BPMN and EPC process modelling, backed by a long-standing enterprise architecture and governance repository.

IGX360 Insights adds

The same process knowledge expressed as a machine-readable canonical model, so the repository becomes something an agent can query, not only something a governance team can read.

IGX360 Insights does not replace your process modelling platform (iGrafx, ARIS, Signavio) or your workflow automation engine (Camunda, Appian, Pega). It is the intelligence and governance layer that sits above them.

Questions

iGrafx, Camunda, Celonis, SAP Signavio, Appian, Pega & ARIS: frequently asked questions

Is IGX360 Insights a replacement for iGrafx, Camunda, Celonis, SAP Signavio, Appian, Pega, or ARIS?

No. IGX360 Insights is not a repository, an orchestration engine, a mining tool, or a modelling platform, and it does not compete for that budget line. It is the decision-level definition layer those tools assume already exists. The relationship is complementary, not competitive: most enterprises run IGX360 Insights alongside one or more of them.

Can IGX360 Insights work alongside our existing workflow or modelling tool?

Yes. IGX360 Insights ingests the process content you already hold, iGrafx first, plus Visio, SOPs, and BPMN/XML, and turns it into a canonical model an agent can act on. It sits underneath the tool you already run, whether that is Camunda, Celonis, SAP Signavio, Appian, Pega, or ARIS, rather than displacing it.

Why does an orchestration, mining, or modelling tool need a definition layer underneath it?

An orchestration or automation engine executes the process definition it is given, and no better than that definition is. A mining tool reports what already happened. A modelling tool documents intent for people to read. None of them produces the authoritative, decision-level account of how work should be done that an AI agent needs before it can act. That account is what IGX360 Insights provides.

What if we do not run any of these tools yet?

IGX360 Insights does not require one of them first. SOPs, spreadsheets, Word documents, and notes from process workshops or interviews are enough to start. A first diagnostic works from whatever process documentation you already have, structured or not, and shows you what it can already answer.

Further reading

Go deeper on where articulation fits.

Mining vs Orchestration vs Articulation: Why Knowing What Happened Isn't Enough for AI

Read the article

See the IGX360 Insights canonical model

Explore Insights

How IGX360 gets you from repository to intelligence

Read the method
See where the gap is

A 90-minute diagnostic over what you already run.

Whichever of these tools you already have in place, we'll run IGX360 Insights against a representative slice of your existing content and show you the definition layer it's missing.